tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5009978.post115516005256443790..comments2023-11-21T07:48:08.321-05:00Comments on Instalawyer.com: Rutherford Weinstein Law Group, PLLChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11122099869431320956noreply@blogger.comBlogger14125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5009978.post-1155414162619091682006-08-12T16:22:00.000-04:002006-08-12T16:22:00.000-04:00To Whom It May Concern:We don't have a monopoly on...To Whom It May Concern:<BR/><BR/>We don't have a monopoly on wisdom: anyone who says they want to be a Democrat should be allowed to be a Democrat. That means pro-lifers; pro-school choicers; blue-collar Catholics; people who support Israel; Southern Baptists; our countrymen in uniform. Anybody.<BR/><BR/>Former DemocratAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5009978.post-1155388644868181032006-08-12T09:17:00.000-04:002006-08-12T09:17:00.000-04:00If there had been polling during the Civl War ther...If there had been polling during the Civl War there would have been about a dozen times where Lincoln's handling of the war might very well have received 70 or even 80% dissapproval. That doesn't mean that most of those people would have demanded an end to the war. Any prolonged conflict will see support erode but that can be a very superficial thing.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5009978.post-1155216322294253312006-08-10T09:25:00.000-04:002006-08-10T09:25:00.000-04:00The "60% of Americans are against the war" comes f...The "60% of Americans are against the war" comes from the same statistical font of wisdom that informs us that more women are abused on Superbowl Sunday than any other day. It only takes one person to say it at the right time and enough people hearing it to so desparately want it to be true for a "statistic" like this to become "truth."<BR/><BR/>Actually the "60%" probably started with some pollsubmandavehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15950457116215345788noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5009978.post-1155207175964388342006-08-10T06:52:00.000-04:002006-08-10T06:52:00.000-04:00If 60% of the country is against the war, how is v...If 60% of the country is against the war, how is voting against a pro-war politician the work of a marginalized fringe?gawkerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17081710140055676484noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5009978.post-1155183438091701582006-08-10T00:17:00.000-04:002006-08-10T00:17:00.000-04:00There are 14 at least vaguely flippable Senate rac...There are 14 at least vaguely flippable Senate races this year -- eight Democratic, six Republican. The Democrats need to win every single one to get a single-seat majority in the Senate.<BR/><BR/>Kos wants to make it one election tougher, by having Lieberman stripped of his caucus rights and committee assignments for "disloyalty", leaving him nowhere to go but the Republican caucus.<BR/><BR/>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5009978.post-1155176460678946902006-08-09T22:21:00.000-04:002006-08-09T22:21:00.000-04:00"...and the White House will be lost again."Uhh, I..."...and the White House will be lost again."<BR/><BR/>Uhh, I think you mean STOLEN again. Heh!Cascajunhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07933062366061584192noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5009978.post-1155170748819118182006-08-09T20:45:00.000-04:002006-08-09T20:45:00.000-04:00I think they _are_ reducing divisions in the party...I think they _are_ reducing divisions in the party, and at the same time they are going to chase more trad Dems groups out of the fold as the Dem consensus starts to mirror the Moore/MoveOn/Kos whiphand that punishes dissenters. Wait until they really go after Hillary, that's the purge they are slavering for, and when they enter that fight they are likely to cause a REAL schism when the docweaselhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10149338353111570983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5009978.post-1155167401517853932006-08-09T19:50:00.000-04:002006-08-09T19:50:00.000-04:00A previous poster asks:Um, if the Democrats are th...A previous poster asks:<BR/><BR/><I>Um, if the Democrats are throwing out their centrists, isn't that making the party less, rather than more, divided?</I><BR/><BR/>Less divided, more marginalized.<BR/><BR/><I>You may want to ask why it is that, if the fringe anti-war left is purging the party, none of the other Democrats in the Senate who supported the Iraq war are facing primary challenges.</I>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5009978.post-1155166457518452172006-08-09T19:34:00.000-04:002006-08-09T19:34:00.000-04:00Blackfacing anyone who is deemed as corrupting the...Blackfacing anyone who is deemed as corrupting the pureness of the ideology isn't going to help the Democrats purge their party of the National Socialists.<BR/><BR/>Something odd about uber-rich white 'liberals' who will vote for a candiate whose supporters 'blackface' all dissenters. It was nasty when it the National Socialists treated Secretary of State Rice as a Aunt Jemima but blackfacing Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5009978.post-1155164933661612032006-08-09T19:08:00.000-04:002006-08-09T19:08:00.000-04:00Um, if the Democrats are throwing out their centri...Um, if the Democrats are throwing out their centrists, isn't that making the party less, rather than more, divided?<BR/><BR/>You may want to ask why it is that, if the fringe anti-war left is purging the party, none of the other Democrats in the Senate who supported the Iraq war are facing primary challenges. (Hint: did any of them kiss President Bush or repeatedly go on Fox News to praise him Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5009978.post-1155164710318142552006-08-09T19:05:00.000-04:002006-08-09T19:05:00.000-04:00That last comment had to have been written by Karl...That last comment had to have been written by Karl Rove.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5009978.post-1155164398327759442006-08-09T18:59:00.000-04:002006-08-09T18:59:00.000-04:00Doug writes: "When are American liberal/Democrat-v...Doug writes: "When are American liberal/Democrat-voting Jews going to get the picture?"<BR/><BR/>That'd be a start. Show them the door. After all, they've caused nothing but confusion and disarray in the party. They get us into defending their commercial interests or worse offending muslims with their zionist false nation.<BR/><BR/>Cindy Sheehan is right that they've done nothing but get the US Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5009978.post-1155162754157441452006-08-09T18:32:00.000-04:002006-08-09T18:32:00.000-04:00Doug Nice analysis. I'm not sure why the consequen...Doug<BR/> <BR/>Nice analysis. I'm not sure why the consequences of the Democratic divide has not been brought up more in the media. To me it's huge. It could dramatically transorm (undermine?) the Democratic party. Here's the formula 30% Dems, 25% Reps, 45% Indies. Run as a socially moderate Independent who's tough on defense and fiscally moderate and split the dems, grab 1/4 of the Reps and mostAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5009978.post-1155161866709357472006-08-09T18:17:00.001-04:002006-08-09T18:17:00.001-04:00TO: Doug WeinsteinRE: Mad Dogs & [Kos]DemocratsI'm...TO: Doug Weinstein<BR/>RE: Mad Dogs & [Kos]Democrats<BR/><BR/>I'm reminded of the business of how mad dogs will snap at themselves.<BR/><BR/>This seems to be what the Democrats, as lead by Kos, are doing. I was beginning to notice it a couple of years ago when the radical feminists and radical animal rights people began 'biting' at each other at some rally in Tennessee or Kentucky or some place Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com